CITY OF EL DORADO, KANSAS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CHAPTER TWO - POPULATION AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The population and economic structure of a community exhibit its most important attributes. An examination of these characteristics is a crucial component of the Comprehensive Plan process because it provides insight into the future needs of the community. A demographic analysis examines the past, present and future make-up of a community in terms of the number of people living there and the age structure of the population. An economic analysis reveals where people work, the wealth of the community, its reliance on local businesses and services and its ability to pay for needed public improvements.
Since population and economic growth are key determinants of the amount of future development that will occur, an accurate understanding of these characteristics is vital to the planning process. It provides a basic understanding of how factors such as national economic trends or lower birth rates influence the community, now and in the future.
An evaluation of past trends in population and a reliable estimate of anticipated changes in population are important components of the Comprehensive Plan. As changes occur over time in El Dorado and the surrounding environs, the nature of the population, both in size and structure, will determine the kind of land use issues which will need to be addressed. This section examines population trends in El Dorado and Butler County as well as surrounding counties. The study projects population through the analysis of these trends.
Since 1940, the population of El Dorado has grown by 43.7.1%, or 4,387 persons in sixty years (Table 2.1). Between 1960 and 1980, El Dorado saw its largest population decrease of the past fifty years as it lost over 2,000 persons, nearly 20% of its population. Since that time, El Dorado's population has steadily increased, growing by 9.5% during the decade of the 1980's. From 1990 to 1997, it is estimated that El Dorado grew by 18%, increasing by 2064 persons (see Appendix A). El Dorado is projected to continue growing. It is in one of the fastest growing counties of the region and is expected to grow by about 5,847 persons in the next twenty years (Table 2.1).
Figure 2.1 - Population Projections for Butler and Neighboring Counties
|
|
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population, Kansas
Note: Sedgwick County’s population has been reduced by a factor of 10 for graphical purposes. 1990 population for Sedgwick is therefore 403,660 and in 2040 is projected to be 601,720.
El Dorado, Kansas
|
1940 |
1950 |
1960 |
1970 |
1980 |
|
10,045 |
11,037 |
12,523 |
12,308 |
10,510 |
|
1990 |
1997 1 |
2000 2 |
2010 2 |
2020 2 |
|
11,504 |
13,568 |
14,432 |
17,356 |
20,279 |
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population, Kansas.
1
Estimate, U.S. Bureau of the Census2
Estimate using Linear regression based on data by US Census and Decisionmark Corp.Table 2.2 - Population Trends El Dorado
Butler County, Wichita MSA and State of Kansas
|
|
1970 |
1980 |
% Change 1970-1980 |
1990 |
% Change 1980-1990 |
1997 |
% Change 1990-1997 |
|
El Dorado Butler County Wichita MSA1 State of Kansas |
12,308 38,658 416,588 2,259,071 |
10,510 44,782 441,844 2,363,679 |
-14.6% 15.8% 6.1% 5.1% |
11,504 50,580 485,270 2,477,574 |
9.5% 12.9% 9.8% 4.8% |
13,504 NA 522,516 2,601,966 |
17.9% NA 7.7% 5.0% |
1
Butler, Sedgwick and Harvey CountiesSource: U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Population, Kansas.
In terms of regional growth, the population of the Wichita Metropolitan Statistical Area, (MSA) which includes Butler, Harvey and Sedgwick Counties, has been both positive and steady. The population of El Dorado has increased at rates faster than the metropolitan area and the State during the past decade: 17.9% compared to 7.7% and 5.0%. The growth rate in the Wichita MSA was also greater than the growth rate for the State of Kansas between 1980 and 1990.
As the population of the City changes, so too does the age structure of the population. The age structure has significant bearing on the future population of the City. Most public services and facilities are designed for a specific age group. For this reason, it is important to examine changes in the age structure as they relate to future needs. For instance, a decrease in the number of women in childbearing years or an increase in persons of retirement age should signal a city to target planning efforts towards educational facilities, senior centers or other related public services.
Figure 2.2 - Population by Age Group
El Dorado, Kansas

Figure 2.2 graphically shows population by age group for 1990, and as estimated for 1997 and 2002. The chart shows a general increase in all age groups, with the exception of the ages 25-34 that show a moderate decrease. The greatest increases are shown in the ages between 35-54 and 75 years and older. The chart shows increases in all school aged children and teens, but only moderate increase in persons in their late teens and early twenties. By comparison with the Wichita MSA and the State of Kansas, the city of El Dorado population is 19% elderly in 2002, compared to 12% and 14% for the region and the State (see Appendix A).
The factors that determine population size and composition are influenced by changes in social and economic trends that are usually uncontrollable by the community. Further, population projections are not an exact science, therefore, it is essential to periodically review the projections to ensure their continuing usefulness to the elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
Population trend projections are released by the Decisionmark Corporation using a proprietary method based on data from the most current U.S. Census updates and estimates including the "Consumer Expenditure Survey," "Current Population Survey" and the "Current Population Report." As the methodology for projections includes "shifting" or extrapolating the county's relative share down to the city level, some degree of error is expected. As the 2000 Census becomes available, additional relevant data will become available and should be considered as part of the recommended annual Comprehensive Plan review.
Table 2.3 - Population Projection by Gender
El Dorado, Kansas from 1990–2002
|
Gender |
1990* |
% of Total |
1997 |
% of Total |
% Change 1990-1997 |
2002 |
% of Total |
% Change 1997-2002 |
|
Female |
5,375 |
47% |
7,293 |
54% |
36% |
8,026 |
53% |
10% |
|
Male |
6,129 |
53% |
6,275 |
46% |
2% |
6,984 |
47% |
11% |
|
Total |
11,504 |
100% |
13,568 |
100% |
18% |
15,010 |
100% |
11% |
|
Source: Decisionmark Corp. |
||||||||
|
*U.S.Census |
||||||||
Table 2.4 - Population Projection by Age Group
El Dorado, Kansas from 1990-2002
|
Age |
1990* |
% of Total |
1997 |
% of Total |
% Change 1990-1997 |
2002 |
% of Total |
% Change 1997-2002 |
|||||||
|
0 to 5 years |
1,008 |
9% |
1,017 |
7% |
1% |
1,083 |
7% |
6% |
|||||||
|
6 to 11 years |
974 |
8% |
1,177 |
9% |
21% |
1,313 |
9% |
12% |
|||||||
|
12 to 17 years |
883 |
8% |
1,193 |
9% |
35% |
1,347 |
9% |
13% |
|||||||
|
18 to 24 years |
1,132 |
10% |
1,241 |
9% |
10% |
1,306 |
9% |
5% |
|||||||
|
25 to 34 years |
1,697 |
15% |
1,654 |
12% |
-3% |
1,611 |
11% |
-3% |
|||||||
|
35 to 44 years |
1,539 |
13% |
2,020 |
15% |
31% |
2,276 |
15% |
13% |
|||||||
|
45 to 54 years |
991 |
9% |
1,456 |
11% |
47% |
1,804 |
12% |
24% |
|||||||
|
55 to 64 years |
1,111 |
10% |
1,258 |
9% |
13% |
1,407 |
9% |
12% |
|||||||
|
65 to 74 years |
1,064 |
9% |
1,164 |
9% |
9% |
1,223 |
8% |
5% |
|||||||
|
75 years and over |
1,105 |
10% |
1,387 |
10% |
26% |
1,638 |
11% |
18% |
|||||||
|
Total |
11,504 |
100% |
13,567 |
100% |
18% |
15,008 |
100% |
11% |
|||||||
|
Source: Decisionmark Corp. |
|||||||||||||||
Table 2.5 - Population Projection - El Dorado, Butler County,
Wichita MSA & State of Kansas from 1990–2002
|
|
1990* |
% of Total |
1997 |
% of Total |
% Change 1990-1997 |
2002 |
% of Total |
% Change 1997-2002 |
|||||||||||||||
|
El Dorado |
11,504 |
100% |
13,568 |
100% |
18% |
15,010 |
100% |
11% |
|||||||||||||||
|
Butler County |
50,580 |
100% |
41,119 |
100% |
-19% |
42,580 |
100% |
4% |
|||||||||||||||
|
Wichita MSA |
485,270 |
100% |
522,516 |
100% |
8% |
546,844 |
100% |
5% |
|||||||||||||||
|
State of Kansas |
2,473,269 |
100% |
2,601,966 |
100% |
5% |
2,681,627 |
100% |
3% |
|||||||||||||||
|
Source: Decisionmark Corp. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
*U.S.Census |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Economic characteristics such as employment and income will be analyzed in this section. An analysis of the El Dorado economy which is included in the Wichita MSA, is useful to the Comprehensive Plan for two reasons. First, an analysis of these factors helps to determine future commercial and industrial land use needs. Secondly, an analysis of the area's economy may point out economic deficiencies, which consequently could have impacts on the community.
One of the best indicators of economic stability is employment. Table 2.6 shows employment by major industry group for residents of Butler County in 1970, 1980, 1990 and 1998. This data provides important information on how the Butler County economy has and is evolving. Total employment during this period almost doubled, increasing by 87%. The largest increase, in terms of percentage increase, was in the agriculture service, forestry, fishing and other sector, while the largest absolute increase was in the service sector.
Table 2.6 – Employment and Employment Change (1970-1998)
Butler County
|
|
Source: Regional Economic Information Systems (REIS)
Table 2.7 gives more data on employment in the Wichita MSA overall. Employment in the Wichita MSA has grown substantially since 1975, as every sector, with the exception of mining, and transportation and public utilities, experienced positive growth overall. The services industry has continued to remain a strong sector, employing the largest number of persons in the metropolitan area. In addition, the services industry experienced the greatest employment increase since 1975. The manufacturing and retail trade sectors placed second and third in the total number of people employed.
Table 2.7 - Non-Farm Employment and Employment Change (1970-1998)
Wichita MSA
|
|
Source: Regional Economic Information Systems (REIS)
Table 2.8 - Employees and Establishments
Butler County, Wichita MSA and State of Kansas
1975 1980 1989
Est. Emp. Est. Emp. Est. Emp.
Butler County 768 7,334 797 9,113 979 9,134
Wichita MSA 9,446 158,410 10,328 209,544 12,399 216,282
State of Kansas 51,121 595,263 55,021 763,326 65,692 865,859
% Change
1975 - 1989
Est. Emp.
Butler County 27.5% 24.5%
Wichita MSA 31.3% 36.5%
State of Kansas 28.5% 45.4%
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns.
* Data represents employment covered by FICA and excludes employees exempt from FICA.
As reported in the Winter, 1992 issue of the Kansas Business Review, both manufacturing and retail employment in south central Kansas has dropped since 1989. However, as employment levels nationally continue to decrease, the Wichita economy has been able to absorb similar economic losses. A strong aerospace industry has kept manufacturing employment levels up and cushioned the area from the impacts experienced by many other communities during the recession of the 1980’s.
With approximately 60 percent of all the area's manufacturing jobs in major aircraft plants, the health of the aircraft industry is critical to the region's overall economy. Backlogged orders at all sites for aircraft and parts provide a buffer for the economy in South Central Kansas throughout the next five years. (Kansas Business Review, Winter, 1992)
El Dorado, Kansas 1999
|
|
Number of Employees |
|
El Dorado Correctional Facility Frontier Oil USD #490 Butler County Community College Butler County Courthouse Pioneer Balloon Dillons Susan B Allen Memorial Hospital Wal-Mart Banks Construction City of El Dorado Equilon Pipeline Lakepoint Blackburn, Inc. KGE/KGS Century Plastics Union Tank Car Co. |
515 460 354 306 234 208 200 193 165* 150* 110 100* 82 80 75* 70 65 |
Source: Butler County Economic Development
* Estimated number of employees based upon past surveys and projected growth.
Table 2.9 shows the city's largest employers, with the El Dorado Correctional Facility employing the greatest number of employees in 1999. The Correctional Facility was originally opened in June, 1991 and now employees approximately 515 persons. Current employment may increase to 600 plus employees with expansion of the facility in the next few years. Another of the area's largest employers is Frontier Oil Corporation with 460 employees.
Unemployment in the City of El Dorado has steadily declined over the past 10 years. According to the Kansas Employment Security Division, the unemployment rate in El Dorado has gone from 8.2% in 1982 to 3.7% in 1991.
Per capita income is an important economic indicator that reveals the overall wealth of an area. Personal income figures are divided by the population of a community to determine per capita income. Table 2.10 presents per capita income for Butler, Harvey and Sedgwick Counties and, for comparison, the State of Kansas.
Table 2.10 - Per Capita Income 1975-1989
(Dollars)
|
1975 |
1980 |
1985 |
1989 |
|
|
Butler County Harvey County Sedgwick County State of Kansas |
$5,607 $5,717 $6,300 $5,955 |
$10,426 $8,995 $11,375 $9,799 |
$13,662 $12,534 $14,904 $13,804 |
$16,192 $14,870 $17,727 $16,526 |
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Local Area Personal Income.
Per capita income in Butler County has shown growth since 1975 by nearly 200%. Although these figures are not in current dollars, they do reflect the increasing wealth in the County. While per capita income in neighboring Sedgwick County has consistently been above that of the State of Kansas, per capita income in Butler County fell below the State average in 1985 and 1989.